Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 06:02

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Just in the last 5 years:

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Why do many women like tall men?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Do you suck dicks with no reciprocation?

What’s next?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Why do I feel worthless most of the time?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

How are you able to read words without vowels? - Live Science

Let’s just make it real clear:

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

If the Red Pill is supposed to be so bad, why are so many young men buying into it? What about Red Pill makes it appealing to them?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Princess Peach's Voice Actor Has Been Replaced After 18 Years - Nintendo Life

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Reality TV star’s son dead at 16: ‘Life is so cruel and unfair’ - AL.com

Russia can stop this any time.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Thank you.

Is it recommended to leave a note in a lost wallet asking for it to be returned?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Simply Couldn't Take The Heart-Pounding Drama Of Championship Hockey - Athlon Sports